We have written Angular since the AngularJS days — which means we build on modern Angular today and we migrate the legacy apps everyone else is afraid to touch. Enterprise dashboards, admin platforms and the long-lived applications Angular was made for.
Frameworks have personalities. Angular’s is the disciplined one: opinionated structure, dependency injection, strict TypeScript and tooling that enforces consistency whether developers feel like it or not. That personality pays off in exactly one situation — large applications maintained by changing teams over many years — which happens to describe most enterprise software. When a client shows us an admin platform that thirty people will extend for a decade, Angular is frequently our recommendation, and modern Angular (standalone components, signals, the current toolchain) is genuinely pleasant in a way its reputation hasn’t caught up with.
The other half of our Angular work is inheritance. AngularJS — the original framework — reached end of life in 2022, yet business-critical AngularJS applications are still running everywhere, quietly accumulating risk: no security patches, shrinking hiring pool, browsers drifting away. We migrate these incrementally, module by module, while the application keeps serving users. No big-bang rewrite, no betting the business on a cutover weekend.
Two frameworks share the name. One is retired and still running in production everywhere; the other is what we build on today. Most of our migration work lives in the overlap.
Modern Angular ships two major versions a year. Standalone components and signals arrived in 2023, and keeping an application current is part of every engagement.
New builds follow our standard rhythm: one to two weeks of discovery producing a scoped plan, then two-week sprints with a working deployment you can click through at every step. A focused first version typically ships in 10 to 16 weeks with a small senior team. Migrations start differently — with an audit of the legacy codebase that produces a module-by-module map and a staged estimate, so you approve the journey in steps rather than signing one frightening number. Either way, around 90% of our developers are senior, QA is dedicated rather than borrowed, and you own every repository from day one.
Either way, the first step is the same: show us what you have in mind, and we will scope it honestly.
Both, for different reasons. New projects are built on current Angular with standalone components, signals and the modern toolchain. AngularJS reached end of life in 2022, so our AngularJS work today is almost entirely migration — moving legacy applications to modern Angular before their unsupported foundations become a security and hiring problem.
No, and a big-bang rewrite is usually the riskiest option. We migrate incrementally: the application keeps running while modules move to modern Angular one at a time, with a hybrid bridge in between. The business never bets everything on a single cutover day.
Angular shines in large, long-lived enterprise applications with many developers: its opinionated structure and batteries-included tooling keep big codebases consistent. Where mobile React Native work shares logic with the web app, React or Next.js usually wins. We advise per project, not per preference — and we maintain serious practices in both.
A focused first version typically takes 10 to 16 weeks with a small senior team, similar to our other web work. Migrations are scoped differently: we audit the legacy codebase first and estimate module by module, so you get a staged budget instead of one frightening number.
Yes. We audit the code, dependency health and update backlog, tell you honestly what state it is in, and stabilize before adding features. Angular’s strict structure actually makes takeovers smoother than most frameworks — provided the previous team followed it.